CCOR vs. ACGR
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CCOR is actively managed, while ACGR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -1.48%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for ACGR. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACGR.
Performance
CCOR vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than ACGR's 4.58% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.77%
ACGR
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.93K | $20.75K | $25.60K | |
| $60.78K | $57.90K | $78.59K |
CCOR vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.03% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 3.38% |
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 4.58% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and ACGR is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.05 |
The correlation between CCOR and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
ACGR
CCOR vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOR | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 0.88 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 2.66 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum ACGR drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and ACGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -34.54% | +11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | -15.84% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -24.58% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -34.54% | +11.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.09% | -4.25% | -11.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -8.42% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 5.25% | -1.06% |
Volatility
CCOR vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 3.00%, while American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 6.06% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.47% | 13.72% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 17.19% | -8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 21.57% | -10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 21.41% | -10.63% |
CCOR vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than ACGR's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and ACGR have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGR has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to CCOR (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs ACGR's -34.54%.
On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 10.88% vs -1.48% for CCOR. On fees, ACGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 10.88% return vs -1.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.12% for ACGR.
They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative and American Century. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.39% for ACGR.
ACGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and ACGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer