CCJ vs. KGC
CCJ (Cameco Corporation) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CCJ returned 25.74%/yr vs 18.81%/yr for KGC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCJ vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 25.74%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.81% annualized return.
CCJ
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 52.94%
- 3Y*
- 47.60%
- 5Y*
- 36.72%
- 10Y*
- 25.74%
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
CCJ vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 10.35% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and KGC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 1996 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CCJ and KGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (10 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CCJ:
$43.98B
KGC:
$30.80B
CCJ:
CA$1.49
KGC:
$2.35
CCJ:
94.45
KGC:
10.87
CCJ:
0.79
KGC:
0.14
CCJ:
17.37
KGC:
3.92
CCJ:
8.68
KGC:
3.37
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
KGC:
$7.94B
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
KGC:
$4.19B
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCJ vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
CCJ
KGC
CCJ vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCJ | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.75 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 5.20 | -0.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCJ | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.53% | -96.00% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -37.69% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.01% | -37.69% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.01% | -59.29% | +19.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.22% | -67.75% | +10.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.71% | -32.63% | +7.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.07% | -57.60% | +11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.99% | 12.66% | -0.67% |
Volatility
CCJ vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) have volatilities of 17.90% and 18.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCJ | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.90% | 18.21% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.91% | 40.59% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.17% | 51.35% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.01% | 44.22% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.75% | 47.01% | -0.26% |
Dividends
CCJ vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than KGC's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CCJ vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCJ vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCJ and KGC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGC has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to CCJ (17.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCJ dropped -87.53% vs KGC's -96.00%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCJ and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer