KGC vs. GFI
KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, KGC returned 16.68%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for GFI. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
KGC vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -23.58% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 16.68%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 20.74% annualized return.
KGC
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- 6M
- -26.61%
- YTD
- -17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 71.30%
- 5Y*
- 30.97%
- 10Y*
- 16.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
GFI
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -33.43%
- YTD
- -23.58%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- 37.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.92M | $118.13M | $131.61M | |
| $162.18M | $178.21M | $212.46M |
KGC vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -17.75% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -23.58% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and GFI is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.70 |
The correlation between KGC and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (10 years) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KGC:
$27.58B
GFI:
$29.02B
KGC:
$2.61
GFI:
$5.39
KGC:
8.84
GFI:
6.01
KGC:
0.12
GFI:
0.10
KGC:
3.32
GFI:
2.07
KGC:
2.86
GFI:
3.44
KGC:
$8.39B
GFI:
$13.98B
KGC:
$4.50B
GFI:
$7.34B
KGC:
$5.58B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGC vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
KGC
GFI
KGC vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.81 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 1.70 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGC vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.00% | -88.05% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.66% | -47.72% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.66% | -47.72% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.22% | -56.22% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | -63.09% | -4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.16% | -45.76% | +6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.51% | -44.24% | -13.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.22% | 22.70% | -4.48% |
Volatility
KGC vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 12.31% and 12.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.31% | 12.44% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.64% | 46.19% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.21% | 61.58% | -9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.41% | 52.84% | -8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.87% | 54.58% | -7.71% |
Dividends
KGC vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than GFI's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.68% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.63% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KGC vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGC vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 2.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 822.76M and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KGC and GFI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to KGC (12.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs GFI's -88.05%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGC and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer