KGC vs. GFI
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KGC or GFI.
Key characteristics
| KGC | GFI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 55.50% | -2.85% |
| 1Y Return | 78.41% | 7.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.93% | 12.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.44% | 24.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.21% | 15.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.64 | 0.68 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | 0.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.01 | 0.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.59% | 13.76% |
| Daily Std Dev | 39.52% | 49.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -96.04% | -86.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -65.24% | -27.66% |
Fundamentals
| KGC | GFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.68B | $12.55B |
| EPS | $0.60 | $0.71 |
| PE Ratio | 15.83 | 19.75 |
| PEG Ratio | -3.90 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.74B | $4.36B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.16B | $1.11B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.91B | $1.91B |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and GFI is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KGC vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a 55.50% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 14.21%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KGC vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KGC vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than GFI's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.07% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.84% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
KGC vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.04%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -86.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KGC vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 15.86% and 15.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KGC vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities