KGC vs. FRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KGC or FRO.
Key characteristics
| KGC | FRO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 55.50% | 3.07% |
| 1Y Return | 78.41% | -2.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.93% | 43.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.44% | 23.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.21% | 18.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | -0.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.64 | 0.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.02 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | -0.03 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.01 | -0.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.59% | 13.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 39.52% | 37.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -96.04% | -98.40% |
| Current Drawdown | -65.24% | -87.51% |
Fundamentals
| KGC | FRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.68B | $4.21B |
| EPS | $0.60 | $2.62 |
| PE Ratio | 15.83 | 7.08 |
| PEG Ratio | -3.90 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $3.74B | $1.55B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.16B | $592.31M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.91B | $782.75M |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and FRO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KGC vs. FRO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a 55.50% return, which is significantly higher than FRO's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has underperformed FRO with an annualized return of 14.21%, while FRO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KGC vs. FRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Frontline Ltd. (FRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KGC vs. FRO - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than FRO's 9.89% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.07% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% |
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 9.89% | 14.31% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 14.77% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KGC vs. FRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FRO drawdown of -98.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and FRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KGC vs. FRO - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 15.86% compared to Frontline Ltd. (FRO) at 8.82%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KGC vs. FRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Frontline Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities