CCJ vs. ASTS
CCJ (Cameco Corporation) and ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) are both stocks. CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy), while ASTS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, CCJ returned 37.97%/yr vs 54.02%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCJ vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than ASTS's 26.75% return.
CCJ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 74.85%
- 3Y*
- 51.07%
- 5Y*
- 37.97%
- 10Y*
- 25.85%
ASTS
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 22.66%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- 195.16%
- 3Y*
- 152.04%
- 5Y*
- 54.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CCJ vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 15.25% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -2.74% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 26.75% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -41.53% | 37.59% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and ASTS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, CCJ and ASTS have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CCJ:
$45.93B
ASTS:
$26.76B
CCJ:
$1.49
ASTS:
-$1.84
CCJ:
12.97
ASTS:
287.63
CCJ:
6.49
ASTS:
10.06
CCJ:
$3.54B
ASTS:
$84.94M
CCJ:
$1.04B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
CCJ:
$996.66M
ASTS:
-$536.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCJ vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
CCJ
ASTS
CCJ vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCJ | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 4.12 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 8.15 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCJ | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.88 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.50 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, roughly equal to the maximum ASTS drawdown of -91.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCJ | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.53% | -91.07% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -47.69% | +22.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.01% | -70.66% | +30.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.01% | -85.57% | +45.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.37% | -30.83% | +9.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -43.38% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.54% | 24.06% | -12.52% |
Volatility
CCJ vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 15.98%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 40.76%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCJ | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.98% | 40.76% | -24.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.04% | 82.89% | -43.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.87% | 104.86% | -48.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.87% | 109.43% | -59.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.69% | 100.53% | -53.84% |
Dividends
CCJ vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
Financials
CCJ vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCJ and ASTS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (40.76%) compared to CCJ (15.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCJ dropped -87.53% vs ASTS's -91.07%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCJ and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer