CCCNX vs. RSNRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX).
CCCNX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Dec 30, 2010. RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995.
Performance
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 21.48% | 2.53% | 44.06% | 18.12% | 15.76% | 40.57% | -35.48% | 8.61% | -13.72% | -6.47% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 15.83% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCCNX achieves a 21.48% return, which is significantly higher than RSNRX's 15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CCCNX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 9.39%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.
CCCNX
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 6M
- 22.08%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 27.50%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
RSNRX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 15.83%
- 6M
- 29.88%
- 1Y
- 104.13%
- 3Y*
- 27.03%
- 5Y*
- 29.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCCNX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCCNX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank
CCCNX
RSNRX
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCCNX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 3.95 | -3.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 4.37 | -3.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.64 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 7.42 | -6.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 27.55 | -24.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCCNX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 3.95 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.44 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.29 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCCNX and RSNRX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison
CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than RSNRX's 3.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 4.60% | 5.49% | 5.08% | 5.94% | 5.51% | 7.15% | 15.53% | 12.04% | 11.73% | 9.19% | 9.86% | 8.85% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.78% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCCNX drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCNX and RSNRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCCNX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.87% | -89.73% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -11.65% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.52% | -25.44% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.43% | -84.27% | +10.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -1.53% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.44% | -26.07% | +10.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.36% | 3.87% | +2.49% |
Volatility
CCCNX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) is 3.99%, while Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that CCCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCCNX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 6.42% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 19.26% | -9.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.35% | 26.76% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 25.42% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.35% | 31.80% | -4.45% |