PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCCNX vs. LADR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCCNX vs. LADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCNX achieves a 20.70% return, which is significantly higher than LADR's -5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CCCNX has outperformed LADR with an annualized return of 7.62%, while LADR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.70% annualized return.


CCCNX

1D
0.26%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
20.70%
6M
22.00%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*
7.62%

LADR

1D
0.89%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-2.74%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
6.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCNX vs. LADR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCCNX
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund
20.70%2.53%44.06%18.12%15.76%40.57%-35.48%8.61%-13.72%-6.47%
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
-5.06%6.69%5.53%25.22%-8.95%31.28%-40.80%26.36%24.54%8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCNX and LADR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2014

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between CCCNX and LADR has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCCNX vs. LADR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCNX
CCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

LADR
LADR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCNX vs. LADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Ladder Capital Corp (LADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCCNXLADRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

0.39

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

0.65

+1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

0.38

+2.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.03

0.87

+7.17

CCCNX vs. LADR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the LADR Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCNX and LADR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCCNXLADRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.39

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.21

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.14

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.10

+0.16

Drawdowns

CCCNX vs. LADR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCNX drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, smaller than the maximum LADR drawdown of -81.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCNX and LADR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCNXLADRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.87%

-81.63%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-14.68%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-20.22%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

-26.97%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.43%

-81.63%

+8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

-9.41%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-18.32%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

6.43%

-3.55%

Volatility

CCCNX vs. LADR - Volatility Comparison

Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) at 3.93%. This indicates that CCCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LADR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCNXLADRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

3.93%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

13.99%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

18.01%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

24.79%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.26%

48.26%

-21.00%

Dividends

CCCNX vs. LADR - Dividend Comparison

CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than LADR's 9.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCCNX
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund
4.68%5.49%5.08%5.94%5.51%7.15%15.53%12.04%11.73%9.19%9.86%8.85%
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
9.03%8.37%8.22%7.99%8.76%6.67%9.61%7.54%9.92%8.91%9.37%17.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCCNX and LADR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCCNX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to LADR (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCNX dropped -75.87% vs LADR's -81.63%.

CCCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCCNX and LADR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer