PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCCNX vs. BLRYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCNX achieves a 22.72% return, which is significantly higher than BLRYX's 7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CCCNX has outperformed BLRYX with an annualized return of 7.80%, while BLRYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.22% annualized return.


CCCNX

1D
1.68%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
22.72%
6M
22.73%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
26.57%
5Y*
20.16%
10Y*
7.80%

BLRYX

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
7.42%
6M
7.42%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
3.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCCNX
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund
22.72%2.53%44.06%18.12%15.76%40.57%-35.48%8.61%-13.72%-6.47%
BLRYX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund
7.42%10.99%1.21%7.11%-22.02%23.74%-10.36%20.46%-8.13%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCNX and BLRYX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between CCCNX and BLRYX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCCNX vs. BLRYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCNX
CCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BLRYX
BLRYX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BLRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BLRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCCNXBLRYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.01

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

1.45

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

1.14

+1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.13

4.38

+3.76

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BLRYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCNX and BLRYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCCNXBLRYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.01

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.04

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.18

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.38

-0.12

Drawdowns

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCNX drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, which is greater than BLRYX's maximum drawdown of -43.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCNX and BLRYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCNXBLRYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.87%

-43.17%

-32.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-10.68%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-17.54%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

-31.85%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.43%

-43.17%

-30.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-3.55%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-8.29%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.78%

+0.12%

Volatility

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Volatility Comparison

Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX) at 3.71%. This indicates that CCCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLRYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCNXBLRYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

3.71%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

9.05%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

12.05%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.81%

16.58%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.27%

17.88%

+9.39%

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCNX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than BLRYX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Dividend Comparison

CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than BLRYX's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLRYX
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund
3.14%2.55%2.72%1.86%2.08%2.25%3.59%4.91%4.32%3.92%6.25%4.08%
CCCNX
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund
4.60%5.49%5.08%5.94%5.51%7.15%15.53%12.04%11.73%9.19%9.86%8.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCCNX and BLRYX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCCNX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to BLRYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCNX dropped -75.87% vs BLRYX's -43.17%.

CCCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCCNX and BLRYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer