CCCNX vs. BLRYX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CCCNX (Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund) and BLRYX (Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund) are both mutual funds - CCCNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Brookfield, while BLRYX is a REIT fund managed by Brookfield. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCCNX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BLRYX.

Performance

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCCNX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.95%
• 6M: 18.51%
• YTD: 25.40%
• 1Y: 25.84%
• 3Y*: 24.92%
• 5Y*: 21.26%
• 10Y*: 8.17%
• ALL TIME*: 6.46%

BLRYX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund	25.40%	2.53%	44.06%	18.12%	15.76%	40.57%	-35.48%	8.61%	-13.72%	-6.47%
BLRYX Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund	9.79%	10.99%	1.21%	7.11%	-22.02%	23.74%	-10.36%	20.46%	-8.13%	10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCNX and BLRYX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between CCCNX and BLRYX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CCCNX vs. BLRYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCCNX

CCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 65
CCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

BLRYX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund (BLRYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCCNX	BLRYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCNX	BLRYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.19%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCCNX	BLRYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.01%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.61%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.16%	—	—

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCNX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than BLRYX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCCNX vs. BLRYX - Dividend Comparison

CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than BLRYX's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLRYX Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate Fund	2.15%	2.55%	2.72%	1.86%	2.08%	2.25%	3.59%	4.91%	4.32%	3.92%	6.25%	4.08%
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund	4.56%	5.49%	5.08%	5.94%	5.51%	7.15%	15.53%	12.04%	11.73%	9.19%	9.86%	8.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCCNX and BLRYX in my portfolio?

CCCNX and BLRYX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.