CCCNX vs. ENFR
CCCNX (Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both funds - CCCNX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Brookfield, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Over the past 10 years, CCCNX returned 8.06%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for ENFR. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CCCNX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCCNX achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 28.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CCCNX has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 8.06%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
CCCNX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 24.46%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.41%
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- YTD
- 28.27%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $5.27M | $3.93M | $3.16M |
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 24.46% | 2.53% | 44.06% | 18.12% | 15.76% | 40.57% | -35.48% | 8.61% | -13.72% | -6.47% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 28.27% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCCNX and ENFR is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CCCNX and ENFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCCNX vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
CCCNX
ENFR
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCCNX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.33 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 8.16 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCCNX drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCNX and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCCNX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.87% | -68.28% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -8.64% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -15.58% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.52% | -20.29% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.43% | -62.64% | -10.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -2.57% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -15.83% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.52% | -0.19% |
Volatility
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund (CCCNX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 5.24% and 5.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCCNX | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.44% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 12.30% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.99% | 15.24% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 19.19% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 24.65% | +2.52% |
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCCNX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCCNX vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
CCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than ENFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCNX Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Focus Fund | 4.59% | 5.49% | 5.08% | 5.94% | 5.51% | 7.15% | 15.53% | 12.04% | 11.73% | 9.19% | 9.86% | 8.85% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.91% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CCCNX and ENFR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to CCCNX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCNX dropped -75.87% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCCNX and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer