QSR vs. RS
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QSR or RS.
Key characteristics
| QSR | RS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -11.04% | 16.83% |
| 1Y Return | 1.85% | 22.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.59% | 26.86% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.58% | 25.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.09 | 0.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.29 | 1.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.03 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.11 | 1.22 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.19 | 2.15 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.71% | 11.15% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.02% | 28.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.03% | -83.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.00% | -4.24% |
Fundamentals
| QSR | RS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $30.63B | $17.49B |
| EPS | $3.99 | $18.28 |
| PE Ratio | 17.01 | 17.68 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.79 | 1.20 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.98B | $14.05B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $5.13B | $1.26B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.17B | $8.89B |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and RS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QSR vs. RS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 16.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QSR vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QSR vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than RS's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.37% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
QSR vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and RS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QSR vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 6.32%, while Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QSR vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities