QSR vs. RS
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) and RS (Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.) are both stocks. QSR operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while RS operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 8.72%/yr vs 20.12%/yr for RS. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
QSR vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly lower than RS's 40.77% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 8.72%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.12% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- YTD
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 13.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
RS
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 24.79%
- YTD
- 40.77%
- 1Y
- 36.85%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- 22.73%
- 10Y*
- 20.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $162.26M | $202.61M | $249.03M | |
| $162.29M | $136.20M | $137.30M |
QSR vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 12.68% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 40.77% | 9.12% | -2.33% | 40.29% | 27.08% | 37.84% | 2.42% | 72.21% | -15.12% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and RS is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QSR and RS has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
QSR:
$26.20B
RS:
$20.60B
QSR:
$2.09
RS:
$17.15
QSR:
36.19
RS:
23.54
QSR:
3.60
RS:
1.33
QSR:
9.26
RS:
2.82
QSR:
$9.59B
RS:
$15.81B
QSR:
$3.17B
RS:
$1.92B
QSR:
$2.49B
RS:
$1.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
RS
QSR vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.94 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 5.15 | -2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and RS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -83.80% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -19.05% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -22.30% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -22.32% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -40.83% | -22.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.69% | -2.58% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -16.43% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 7.23% | -1.26% |
Volatility
QSR vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 7.09%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | RS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 7.09% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.88% | 19.00% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 23.65% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 27.96% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 29.59% | -2.05% |
Dividends
QSR vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than RS's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.36% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.21% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% |
Financials
QSR vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. RS - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of -1.10B and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.8%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
RS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 441.60M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
RS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 322.90M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and RS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSR has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to RS (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs RS's -83.80%.
RS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and RS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer