QSR vs. RS
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QSR or RS.
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and RS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QSR vs. RS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QSR:
-0.35
RS:
-0.01
QSR:
-0.36
RS:
0.22
QSR:
0.96
RS:
1.03
QSR:
-0.40
RS:
-0.02
QSR:
-0.65
RS:
-0.03
QSR:
11.79%
RS:
11.66%
QSR:
21.94%
RS:
29.16%
QSR:
-63.03%
RS:
-83.80%
QSR:
-16.63%
RS:
-20.01%
Fundamentals
QSR:
$30.58B
RS:
$15.16B
QSR:
$3.99
RS:
$18.28
QSR:
16.91
RS:
15.32
QSR:
1.79
RS:
1.20
QSR:
$7.97B
RS:
$14.05B
QSR:
$4.74B
RS:
$4.05B
QSR:
$2.63B
RS:
$1.60B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a -11.70% return, which is significantly lower than RS's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 8.42%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.57% annualized return.
QSR
-11.70%
-2.94%
-1.91%
-9.63%
4.17%
8.42%
RS
-2.41%
-13.90%
-3.86%
-2.18%
19.41%
18.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QSR vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QSR vs. RS - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than RS's 1.64% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.47% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RS Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. | 1.64% | 1.43% | 1.73% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.81% | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
QSR vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum RS drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and RS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QSR vs. RS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 5.84%, while Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QSR vs. RS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities