QSR vs. MG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Magna International Inc. (MG.TO).
Performance
QSR vs. MG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QSR vs. MG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 9.27% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
MG.TO Magna International Inc. | 5.63% | 33.80% | -26.35% | 8.87% | -28.67% | 16.68% | 33.39% | 24.27% | -12.21% | 34.28% |
Different Trading Currencies
QSR is traded in USD, while MG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
QSR:
$33.77B
MG.TO:
CA$21.85B
QSR:
$2.05
MG.TO:
CA$2.93
QSR:
36.02
MG.TO:
26.55
QSR:
3.58
MG.TO:
0.52
QSR:
9.29
MG.TO:
1.75
QSR:
$9.43B
MG.TO:
CA$42.18B
QSR:
$2.70B
MG.TO:
CA$5.58B
QSR:
$2.32B
MG.TO:
CA$3.83B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than MG.TO's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed MG.TO with an annualized return of 9.86%, while MG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 17.27%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
MG.TO
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- 71.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- -5.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. MG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
MG.TO
QSR vs. MG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Magna International Inc. (MG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSR | MG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 2.00 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 3.19 | -2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.40 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.05 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 11.18 | -8.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSR | MG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 2.00 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | -0.16 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.20 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and MG.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QSR vs. MG.TO - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than MG.TO's 3.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.40% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
MG.TO Magna International Inc. | 3.48% | 3.73% | 4.34% | 3.18% | 3.07% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.74% | 9.64% | 2.40% | 2.70% | 2.42% |
Drawdowns
QSR vs. MG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, roughly equal to the maximum MG.TO drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and MG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | MG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -75.69% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -22.79% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -60.21% | +29.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -60.21% | -2.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -26.60% | +23.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.18% | -22.19% | +10.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 6.49% | -0.44% |
Volatility
QSR vs. MG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 6.92%, while Magna International Inc. (MG.TO) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | MG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 9.95% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 27.31% | -10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.66% | 35.80% | -12.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 35.47% | -13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 35.47% | -7.99% |
Financials
QSR vs. MG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Magna International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. MG.TO - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Magna International Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 11.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.2%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 621.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
MG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Magna International Inc. reported an operating income of 749.34M and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
MG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Magna International Inc. reported a net income of -1.02M and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.