QSR vs. YUM
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QSR or YUM.
Performance
QSR vs. YUM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's 3.77% return.
QSR
-11.49%
-6.38%
-3.11%
-1.64%
3.86%
N/A
YUM
3.77%
0.18%
-4.76%
6.58%
8.33%
11.18%
Fundamentals
QSR | YUM | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $30.42B | $38.13B |
EPS | $3.99 | $5.36 |
PE Ratio | 16.88 | 25.49 |
PEG Ratio | 1.79 | 2.13 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.98B | $7.62B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $5.13B | $3.91B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $2.17B | $2.47B |
Key characteristics
QSR | YUM | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | -0.05 | 0.47 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.09 | 0.79 |
Omega Ratio | 1.01 | 1.09 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.05 | 0.64 |
Martin Ratio | -0.10 | 1.67 |
Ulcer Index | 10.90% | 4.56% |
Daily Std Dev | 21.94% | 16.05% |
Max Drawdown | -63.03% | -67.69% |
Current Drawdown | -16.44% | -5.78% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and YUM is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QSR vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QSR vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than YUM's 1.96% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.39% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YUM! Brands, Inc. | 1.96% | 1.87% | 1.78% | 1.44% | 1.73% | 1.67% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QSR vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and YUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QSR vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 4.88%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QSR vs. YUM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities