QSR vs. YUM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM).

Performance

QSR vs. YUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QSR vs. YUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc.	11.04%	8.64%	-13.80%	24.64%	10.72%	2.72%	-0.34%	25.61%	-12.15%	30.69%
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	2.07%	14.94%	4.72%	3.93%	-5.99%	30.05%	9.85%	11.41%	14.61%	31.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QSR : $34.32B YUM : $42.73B
EPS QSR : $2.05 YUM : $5.57
PE Ratio QSR : 36.60 YUM : 27.60
PS Ratio QSR : 3.64 YUM : 5.24
Total Revenue (TTM) QSR : $9.43B YUM : $8.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) QSR : $2.70B YUM : $2.67B
EBITDA (TTM) QSR : $2.32B YUM : $2.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than YUM's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed YUM with an annualized return of 10.03%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.

QSR

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 5.30%
• YTD: 11.04%
• 6M: 15.53%
• 1Y: 15.99%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

YUM

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -5.66%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: -1.42%
• 3Y*: 7.22%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 12.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QSR vs. YUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSR

QSR Risk / Return Rank: 62
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

YUM

YUM Risk / Return Rank: 35
YUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
YUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
YUM Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
YUM Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSR vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSR	YUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	-0.06	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	0.07	+0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.01	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	-0.03	+1.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	-0.06	+2.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSR vs. YUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and YUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSR	YUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	-0.06	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.45	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.53	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.49	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between QSR and YUM is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QSR vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than YUM's 1.87% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc.	3.34%	3.63%	3.56%	2.82%	3.34%	3.49%	3.40%	3.14%	3.44%	1.27%	1.30%	1.18%
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc.	1.87%	1.88%	2.00%	1.85%	1.78%	1.44%	1.73%	1.67%	1.57%	1.47%	41.26%	2.31%

Drawdowns

QSR vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and YUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSR	YUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.03%	-67.69%	+4.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-13.88%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	-23.10%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.03%	-52.17%	-10.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-8.60%	+6.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.17%	-12.41%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	7.82%	-1.77%

Volatility

QSR vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 5.58%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSR	YUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	5.58%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.66%	15.90%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.49%	22.98%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.31%	20.19%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.48%	22.64%	+4.84%

Financials

QSR vs. YUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 621.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 738.00M and revenue of 2.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.51B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.