QSR vs. YUM

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed YUM with an annualized return of 7.02%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and YUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than YUM's 1.85% yield.

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and YUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 11.26%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.