PortfoliosLab logo
QSR vs. YUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between QSR and YUM is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

QSR vs. YUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QSR:

0.04

YUM:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

QSR:

0.17

YUM:

0.81

Omega Ratio

QSR:

1.02

YUM:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

QSR:

0.00

YUM:

0.73

Martin Ratio

QSR:

0.00

YUM:

1.65

Ulcer Index

QSR:

8.98%

YUM:

6.01%

Daily Std Dev

QSR:

23.64%

YUM:

22.18%

Max Drawdown

QSR:

-63.03%

YUM:

-67.69%

Current Drawdown

QSR:

-12.19%

YUM:

-9.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QSR:

$30.99B

YUM:

$40.35B

EPS

QSR:

$2.95

YUM:

$5.01

PE Ratio

QSR:

23.06

YUM:

28.97

PEG Ratio

QSR:

1.18

YUM:

2.14

PS Ratio

QSR:

3.53

YUM:

5.21

PB Ratio

QSR:

7.15

YUM:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

QSR:

$8.78B

YUM:

$7.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QSR:

$4.10B

YUM:

$4.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

QSR:

$2.63B

YUM:

$2.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed YUM with an annualized return of 8.54%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


QSR

YTD

7.89%

1M

11.72%

6M

3.62%

1Y

0.99%

5Y*

10.02%

10Y*

8.54%

YUM

YTD

10.13%

1M

1.63%

6M

8.57%

1Y

8.38%

5Y*

13.76%

10Y*

9.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QSR vs. YUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QSR is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QSR is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QSR is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QSR is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QSR is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QSR is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

YUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUM is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUM is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUM is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUM is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUM is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUM is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QSR vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and YUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QSR vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than YUM's 1.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.39%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%0.00%
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.85%2.00%1.87%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QSR vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and YUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QSR vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 5.47%, while YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

QSR vs. YUM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20212022202320242025
2.11B
1.79B
(QSR) Total Revenue
(YUM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QSR vs. YUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
33.4%
70.9%
(QSR) Gross Margin
(YUM) Gross Margin
QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 704.00M and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

YUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 435.00M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

YUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 965.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.0%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 159.00M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

YUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 253.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.