CBFV vs. FHN
CBFV (CB Financial Services, Inc.) and FHN (First Horizon Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, CBFV returned 9.34%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for FHN. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CBFV vs. FHN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBFV achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than FHN's 8.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CBFV having a 9.34% annualized return and FHN not far ahead at 9.60%.
CBFV
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 22.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.46%
FHN
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $227.59K | $182.66K | $228.71K | |
| $135.81M | $152.97M | $119.08M |
CBFV vs. FHN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBFV CB Financial Services, Inc. | 6.73% | 25.99% | 25.11% | 16.48% | -7.16% | 25.67% | -30.79% | 26.28% | -14.92% | 19.86% |
FHN First Horizon Corporation | 8.85% | 22.12% | 47.68% | -39.44% | 53.94% | 32.61% | -18.45% | 30.48% | -32.35% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBFV and FHN is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2001 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, CBFV and FHN have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CBFV:
$185.81M
FHN:
$12.17B
CBFV:
$1.35
FHN:
$2.14
CBFV:
27.03
FHN:
11.96
CBFV:
2.68
FHN:
2.73
CBFV:
1.21
FHN:
1.45
CBFV:
$72.81M
FHN:
$4.63B
CBFV:
$47.38M
FHN:
$3.49B
CBFV:
$9.29M
FHN:
$1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBFV vs. FHN — Risk / Return Rank
CBFV
FHN
CBFV vs. FHN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) and First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBFV | FHN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.27 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 3.17 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBFV vs. FHN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBFV drawdown since its inception was -50.77%, smaller than the maximum FHN drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBFV and FHN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBFV | FHN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.77% | -87.74% | +36.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.93% | -16.52% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -27.14% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.33% | -60.76% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.77% | -64.25% | +13.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.39% | -1.57% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.72% | -20.00% | +7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 6.59% | -1.85% |
Volatility
CBFV vs. FHN - Volatility Comparison
CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to First Horizon Corporation (FHN) at 6.10%. This indicates that CBFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBFV | FHN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 6.10% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.63% | 16.70% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.72% | 25.24% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 36.77% | -10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 38.85% | -10.06% |
Dividends
CBFV vs. FHN - Dividend Comparison
CBFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than FHN's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBFV CB Financial Services, Inc. | 2.95% | 2.93% | 3.50% | 4.20% | 4.48% | 3.99% | 4.80% | 3.19% | 3.59% | 2.93% | 3.40% | 3.71% |
FHN First Horizon Corporation | 2.50% | 2.51% | 2.98% | 4.24% | 2.45% | 3.67% | 4.70% | 3.38% | 3.65% | 1.80% | 1.40% | 1.65% |
Financials
CBFV vs. FHN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CB Financial Services, Inc. and First Horizon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBFV vs. FHN - Profitability Comparison
CBFV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CB Financial Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.49M and revenue of 21.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.8%.
FHN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported a gross profit of 871.00M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
CBFV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CB Financial Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.10M and revenue of 21.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.
FHN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
CBFV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CB Financial Services, Inc. reported a net income of 4.30M and revenue of 21.88M, resulting in a net margin of 19.7%.
FHN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported a net income of 271.00M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBFV and FHN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBFV has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to FHN (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBFV dropped -50.77% vs FHN's -87.74%.
FHN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBFV and FHN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer