CB vs. MEDP
CB (Chubb Limited) and MEDP (Medpace Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while MEDP operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, CB returned 15.72%/yr vs 21.82%/yr for MEDP. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CB vs. MEDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CB achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than MEDP's -18.47% return.
CB
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
MEDP
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 8.00%
- YTD
- -18.47%
- 6M
- -16.62%
- 1Y
- 54.44%
- 3Y*
- 30.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CB vs. MEDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 3.43% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | -18.47% | 69.05% | 8.38% | 44.31% | -2.40% | 56.35% | 65.60% | 58.81% | 45.97% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CB and MEDP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CB and MEDP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CB:
$127.01B
MEDP:
$13.26B
CB:
$28.35
MEDP:
$15.63
CB:
11.35
MEDP:
29.29
CB:
0.79
MEDP:
0.88
CB:
2.67
MEDP:
5.04
CB:
1.59
MEDP:
22.17
CB:
$48.15B
MEDP:
$2.68B
CB:
$17.01B
MEDP:
$778.59M
CB:
$12.22B
MEDP:
$572.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CB vs. MEDP — Risk / Return Rank
CB
MEDP
CB vs. MEDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chubb Limited (CB) and Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CB | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.32 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 3.38 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CB | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.79 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.43 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.67 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
CB vs. MEDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CB drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than MEDP's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CB and MEDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CB | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -42.87% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -36.61% | +27.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -39.38% | +25.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -42.87% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -26.22% | +20.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -12.91% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 16.16% | -11.64% |
Volatility
CB vs. MEDP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chubb Limited (CB) is 6.11%, while Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that CB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CB | MEDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 6.61% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 37.78% | -24.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 69.11% | -51.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 51.61% | -31.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 49.80% | -26.11% |
Dividends
CB vs. MEDP - Dividend Comparison
CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while MEDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CB vs. MEDP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chubb Limited and Medpace Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CB and MEDP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEDP has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CB dropped -50.99% vs MEDP's -42.87%.
MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CB and MEDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer