CAUV.TO vs. IWMI
CAUV.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAUV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. CAUV.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.
Performance
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CAUV.TO is traded in CAD, while IWMI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWMI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CAUV.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMI
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 34.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank
CAUV.TO
IWMI
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (CAUV.TO) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUV.TO | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.06 | — |
Drawdowns
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUV.TO | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.63% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.30% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUV.TO | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.87% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.59% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.59% | — |
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUV.TO vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison
CAUV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAUV.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 13.77% | 14.05% | 8.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CAUV.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAUV.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IWMI.
CAUV.TO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IWMI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CAUV.TO and 0.68% for IWMI.
Find the right allocation for CAUV.TO and IWMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer