CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO
CAUV.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAUV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CAUV.TO is actively managed, while VFV.TO is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAUV.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAUV.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAUV.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 5.90% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUV.TO and VFV.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CAUV.TO
VFV.TO
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (CAUV.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUV.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 1.14 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.68%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUV.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUV.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -27.43% | +19.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.18% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -3.35% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUV.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 11.46% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 14.91% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 16.57% | -1.08% |
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUV.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CAUV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUV.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUV.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CAUV.TO.
CAUV.TO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CAUV.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for CAUV.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer