PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATH vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CATH vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CATH vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
-4.96%17.08%23.34%26.15%-19.96%28.87%18.80%30.64%-5.80%22.83%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-6.56%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -6.56% return.


CATH

1D
2.94%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
-4.96%
6M
-3.12%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*

AAPL

1D
2.90%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
16.20%
10Y*
26.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATH vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATH
CATH Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATH vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CATHAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.47

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

0.92

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

0.74

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

2.30

+4.41

CATH vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATH Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATH and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CATHAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.47

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.59

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.43

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CATH and AAPL is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CATH vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
0.88%0.84%0.95%1.16%1.34%1.03%1.23%0.68%2.01%1.27%0.50%0.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.41%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%

Drawdowns

CATH vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and AAPL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CATHAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-81.80%

+47.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-22.99%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.14%

-33.36%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-11.24%

+4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-29.71%

+24.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

7.38%

-4.74%

Volatility

CATH vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CATHAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

5.58%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

15.09%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.81%

31.66%

-12.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

27.46%

-9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

28.94%

-10.32%