PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATH vs. PRAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CATH vs. PRAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CATH vs. PRAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
-4.96%17.08%23.34%26.15%-15.24%
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
2.94%9.08%13.02%20.02%-13.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than PRAY's 2.94% return.


CATH

1D
2.94%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
-4.96%
6M
-3.12%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*

PRAY

1D
3.11%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.31%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CATH vs. PRAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAY's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CATH vs. PRAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATH
CATH Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAY
PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATH vs. PRAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CATHPRAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.84

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.34

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.17

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

5.43

+1.29

CATH vs. PRAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATH Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the PRAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATH and PRAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CATHPRAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.84

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.43

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CATH and PRAY is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CATH vs. PRAY - Dividend Comparison

CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than PRAY's 0.67% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
0.88%0.84%0.95%1.16%1.34%1.03%1.23%0.68%2.01%1.27%0.50%
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
0.67%0.69%0.76%0.83%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CATH vs. PRAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than PRAY's maximum drawdown of -21.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and PRAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CATHPRAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-21.40%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-11.45%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-5.97%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.61%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.47%

+0.17%

Volatility

CATH vs. PRAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 5.38%, while FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CATHPRAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

6.29%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

9.78%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.81%

16.78%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.03%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

16.03%

+2.59%