PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRAY vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PRAY and BDGS is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

PRAY vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
30.32%
29.31%
PRAY
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRAY:

1.26

BDGS:

4.50

Sortino Ratio

PRAY:

1.80

BDGS:

8.68

Omega Ratio

PRAY:

1.23

BDGS:

2.63

Calmar Ratio

PRAY:

2.35

BDGS:

8.26

Martin Ratio

PRAY:

7.85

BDGS:

48.12

Ulcer Index

PRAY:

2.00%

BDGS:

0.41%

Daily Std Dev

PRAY:

12.47%

BDGS:

4.38%

Max Drawdown

PRAY:

-21.40%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

PRAY:

-5.32%

BDGS:

-0.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAY achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 19.39% return.


PRAY

YTD

13.62%

1M

-3.13%

6M

5.22%

1Y

14.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

19.39%

1M

2.07%

6M

14.30%

1Y

19.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRAY vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for PRAY: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRAY vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRAY, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.264.50
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRAY, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.808.68
The chart of Omega ratio for PRAY, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.232.63
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRAY, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.358.26
The chart of Martin ratio for PRAY, currently valued at 7.85, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.8548.12
PRAY
BDGS

The current PRAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAY and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.26
4.50
PRAY
BDGS

Dividends

PRAY vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

PRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while BDGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
1.49%0.83%1.20%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.00%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

PRAY vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAY drawdown since its inception was -21.40%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAY and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.32%
-0.98%
PRAY
BDGS

Volatility

PRAY vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.38%. This indicates that PRAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.99%
1.38%
PRAY
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab