PRAY vs. WCBR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PRAY (FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF) and WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PRAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NONE, while WCBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRAY returned 16.00%/yr vs 18.88%/yr for WCBR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRAY charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WCBR.

Performance

PRAY vs. WCBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRAY having a 14.34% return and WCBR slightly lower at 13.66%.

PRAY

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 14.34%
• 6M: 13.57%
• 1Y: 20.62%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WCBR

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 6M: 10.28%
• 1Y: 2.64%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAY vs. WCBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	14.34%	9.08%	13.02%	20.02%	-12.71%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	13.66%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-32.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAY and WCBR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	0.62

The correlation between PRAY and WCBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRAY vs. WCBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRAY	WCBR
Technology	29.0%	100.0%
Industrials	14.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	-
Financial Services	12.4%	-
Communication Services	8.3%	-
Healthcare	7.0%	-
Utilities	3.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

PRAY vs. WCBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAY

PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 49
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 10
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAY vs. WCBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRAY	WCBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	0.08	+1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	0.34	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.04	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	0.09	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	0.20	+9.88

PRAY vs. WCBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the WCBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAY and WCBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRAY vs. WCBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAY drawdown since its inception was -21.40%, smaller than the maximum WCBR drawdown of -52.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAY and WCBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRAY	WCBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.40%	-52.25%	+30.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	-29.92%	+21.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.13%	-30.27%	+13.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-14.46%	+13.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-20.27%	+14.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	13.28%	-11.23%

Volatility

PRAY vs. WCBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) is 5.30%, while WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a volatility of 14.04%. This indicates that PRAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRAY	WCBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	14.04%	-8.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	27.70%	-16.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.50%	32.66%	-19.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.08%	33.66%	-17.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.08%	33.53%	-17.45%

PRAY vs. WCBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than WCBR's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRAY vs. WCBR - Dividend Comparison

PRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	0.60%	0.69%	0.76%	0.83%	1.20%	0.00%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRAY and WCBR in my portfolio?

PRAY and WCBR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRAY or WCBR?

WCBR has higher volatility (14.04%) compared to PRAY (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRAY dropped -21.40% vs WCBR's -52.25%.

Which ETF is better, PRAY or WCBR?

On 3-year performance, WCBR leads with 18.88% vs 16.00% for PRAY. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PRAY has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRAY or WCBR?

Over the 3-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 18.88% return vs 16.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRAY or WCBR?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PRAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRAY or WCBR?

PRAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

What is the main difference between PRAY and WCBR?

PRAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WCBR is Technology Equities. PRAY tracks NONE, while WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for PRAY and 0.45% for WCBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.