CARZ vs. TMH
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR) while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
CARZ vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CARZ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 19.08%
- YTD
- 57.52%
- 6M
- 60.74%
- 1Y
- 116.25%
- 3Y*
- 34.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.49%
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARZ vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 2.83% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and TMH is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
TMH
CARZ vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | -5.39 | +5.85 |
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -5.59% | -45.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -5.59% | +5.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.90% | -4.22% | -8.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | — | — |
Volatility
CARZ vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.79% | 20.85% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 20.85% | +7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 20.85% | +5.42% |
CARZ vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.35% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and TMH have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.
CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer