CARZ vs. TMH
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR) while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
CARZ vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CARZ
- 1D
- -6.26%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 45.91%
- 6M
- 45.04%
- 1Y
- 96.22%
- 3Y*
- 30.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARZ vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | -4.04% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and TMH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CARZ vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -10.20% | -41.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -10.20% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -5.78% | -7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | — | — |
Volatility
CARZ vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.42% | 25.94% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 25.94% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 25.94% | +0.60% |
CARZ vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than TMH's 5.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.46% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and TMH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 1.46% for CARZ.
CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer