CARZ vs. TMH
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR) while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
CARZ vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CARZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 66.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
TMH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $535.60K | $505.64K | $494.01K | |
| $27.07K | $29.18K | $21.96K |
CARZ vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | -13.77% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and TMH is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CARZ vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -10.32% | -40.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.07% | -4.33% | -12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -5.05% | -7.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | — | — |
Volatility
CARZ vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.88% | 26.85% | +5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 26.85% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 26.85% | -0.08% |
CARZ vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than TMH's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.34% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and TMH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.34% for CARZ.
CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer