PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARZ vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARZ vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 37.83% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 15.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 14.96%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.76% annualized return.


CARZ

1D
-3.25%
1M
-7.39%
6M
28.29%
YTD
37.83%
1Y
72.79%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
14.96%

FDL

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.89%
6M
12.56%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARZ vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
37.83%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
15.23%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CARZ and FDL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2011

0.47

The correlation between CARZ and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CARZ vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CARZ
FDL

Technology

34.3%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

21.9%
4.7%

Industrials

8.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

6.7%
0.3%

Communication Services

1.9%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.4%

Energy

-

25.7%

Financial Services

-

15.2%

Healthcare

-

17.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.5%

Technology

CARZ
34.3%
FDL
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CARZ
21.9%
FDL
4.7%

Industrials

CARZ
8.6%
FDL
3.9%

Basic Materials

CARZ
6.7%
FDL
0.3%

Communication Services

CARZ
1.9%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

CARZ

-

FDL
14.4%

Energy

CARZ

-

FDL
25.7%

Financial Services

CARZ

-

FDL
15.2%

Healthcare

CARZ

-

FDL
17.6%

Real Estate

CARZ

-

FDL

-

Utilities

CARZ

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARZ vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARZ vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CARZFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

4.89

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.53

11.11

+5.42

CARZ vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARZ and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CARZ vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARZFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.20%

-65.93%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-4.27%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-12.24%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-16.46%

-23.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

-41.40%

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.82%

-0.89%

-11.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-9.62%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

1.88%

+2.54%

Volatility

CARZ vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.65%. This indicates that CARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARZFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

4.65%

+10.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.56%

8.37%

+18.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.58%

11.65%

+18.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.09%

14.37%

+14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.63%

17.12%

+9.51%

CARZ vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARZ vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.27%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARZ and FDL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to FDL (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, CARZ leads with 14.96% vs 10.76% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.27% for CARZ.

CARZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.43% for FDL.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARZ and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer