CARZ vs. FDL
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CARZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CARZ returned 14.96%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for FDL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
CARZ vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 37.83% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 15.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CARZ has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 14.96%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.76% annualized return.
CARZ
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- 6M
- 28.29%
- YTD
- 37.83%
- 1Y
- 72.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
FDL
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
CARZ vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 37.83% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 54.66% | 11.39% | -23.91% | 25.47% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 15.23% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and FDL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2011 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CARZ and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CARZ vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CARZ
FDL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CARZ
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
CARZ
FDL
Industrials
CARZ
FDL
Basic Materials
CARZ
FDL
Communication Services
CARZ
FDL
Consumer Defensive
CARZ
-
FDL
Energy
CARZ
-
FDL
Financial Services
CARZ
-
FDL
Healthcare
CARZ
-
FDL
Real Estate
CARZ
-
FDL
-
Utilities
CARZ
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
FDL
CARZ vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARZ | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.31 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 4.89 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.53 | 11.11 | +5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -65.93% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -4.27% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -12.24% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | -16.46% | -23.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | -41.40% | -9.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.82% | -0.89% | -11.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.86% | -9.62% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 1.88% | +2.54% |
Volatility
CARZ vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.65%. This indicates that CARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.06% | 4.65% | +10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.56% | 8.37% | +18.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.58% | 11.65% | +18.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 14.37% | +14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 17.12% | +9.51% |
CARZ vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.27% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and FDL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARZ has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to FDL (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 10-year performance, CARZ leads with 14.96% vs 10.76% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.27% for CARZ.
CARZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.43% for FDL.
CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer