CARZ vs. BETZ
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR) while BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CARZ returned 15.95%/yr vs -8.57%/yr for BETZ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.
Performance
CARZ vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 55.03% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -8.72% return.
CARZ
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 55.03%
- 6M
- 57.92%
- 1Y
- 110.10%
- 3Y*
- 33.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.95%
- 10Y*
- 16.21%
BETZ
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -6.57%
- 1Y
- -5.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- -8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
CARZ vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 55.03% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 64.34% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.72% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 60.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and BETZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CARZ and BETZ has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CARZ vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CARZ
BETZ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CARZ
BETZ
Consumer Cyclical
CARZ
BETZ
Industrials
CARZ
BETZ
-
Basic Materials
CARZ
BETZ
-
Communication Services
CARZ
BETZ
Consumer Defensive
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Energy
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Financial Services
CARZ
-
BETZ
Healthcare
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Real Estate
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Utilities
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
BETZ
CARZ vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 0.97 | +0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.67 | -0.18 | +7.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.97 | -0.31 | +31.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28 | -0.26 | +4.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | -0.32 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.14 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -60.82% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -29.20% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -29.20% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | -60.35% | +20.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -38.25% | +36.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.89% | -33.81% | +20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 17.05% | -13.48% |
Volatility
CARZ vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 5.58%. This indicates that CARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 5.58% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 15.92% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.86% | 20.57% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.11% | 26.95% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 27.94% | -1.67% |
CARZ vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BETZ's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.01% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.38% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and BETZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARZ has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to BETZ (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs BETZ's -60.82%.
On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 15.95% vs -8.57% for BETZ. On fees, CARZ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 15.95% return vs -8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARZ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.38% for CARZ.
CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.75% for BETZ.
CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer