CARZ vs. BETZ
CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR) while BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CARZ returned 12.76%/yr vs -5.76%/yr for BETZ. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CARZ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.
Performance
CARZ vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARZ achieves a 32.79% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -9.34% return.
CARZ
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- YTD
- 32.79%
- 1Y
- 68.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.24%
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- -9.34%
- 1Y
- -17.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- -5.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $191.53K | $296.77K | $793.97K | |
| $456.71K | $511.80K | $495.78K |
CARZ vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 32.79% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 62.55% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -9.34% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 65.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARZ and BETZ is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CARZ and BETZ has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CARZ vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CARZ
BETZ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CARZ
BETZ
Consumer Cyclical
CARZ
BETZ
Industrials
CARZ
BETZ
Basic Materials
CARZ
BETZ
-
Communication Services
CARZ
BETZ
Consumer Defensive
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Energy
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Financial Services
CARZ
-
BETZ
Healthcare
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Real Estate
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Utilities
CARZ
-
BETZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARZ vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
CARZ
BETZ
CARZ vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.88 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | -0.60 | +3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | -0.92 | +12.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARZ vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARZ drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARZ and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.20% | -60.82% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | -29.20% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -29.20% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.30% | -59.79% | +19.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -38.67% | +22.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -33.90% | +21.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 18.97% | -13.06% |
Volatility
CARZ vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 5.97%. This indicates that CARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARZ | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 5.97% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.69% | 16.83% | +10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.82% | 21.21% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 26.98% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 27.84% | -1.07% |
CARZ vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARZ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARZ vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
CARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than BETZ's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.04% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.32% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARZ and BETZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARZ has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to BETZ (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARZ dropped -51.20% vs BETZ's -60.82%.
On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 12.76% vs -5.76% for BETZ. On fees, CARZ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 12.76% return vs -5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARZ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 1.32% for CARZ.
CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR), while BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CARZ and 0.75% for BETZ.
CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARZ and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer