CARU vs. GUSH
CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CARU tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARU returned -12.67%/yr vs 7.14%/yr for GUSH. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
CARU vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -22.79% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 70.77% return.
CARU
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 11.87%
- 6M
- -26.51%
- YTD
- -22.79%
- 1Y
- -18.35%
- 3Y*
- -12.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- 19.65%
- 6M
- 61.34%
- YTD
- 70.77%
- 1Y
- 58.58%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- -35.65%
CARU vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | -22.79% | 7.29% | 23.44% | -9.74% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 70.77% | -19.39% | -12.73% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARU and GUSH is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.22 |
The correlation between CARU and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARU vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
CARU
GUSH
CARU vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARU | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.19 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.63 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 3.73 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARU vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARU | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -99.98% | +33.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.87% | -36.18% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.44% | -63.59% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.03% | -99.79% | +60.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -92.96% | +56.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.31% | 15.77% | +11.54% |
Volatility
CARU vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 13.52%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARU | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.36% | 13.52% | +7.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.60% | 44.38% | +9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.47% | 56.38% | +14.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.99% | 67.75% | +12.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.99% | 92.95% | -12.96% |
CARU vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARU vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.28% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARU and GUSH have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARU has higher volatility (21.36%) compared to GUSH (13.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs GUSH's -99.98%.
On 3-year performance, GUSH leads with 7.14% vs -12.67% for CARU. On fees, CARU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 13.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 7.14% return vs -12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.
CARU tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARU and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer