CANE vs. TAFM
CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and TAFM (AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while TAFM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. CANE is passively managed, while TAFM is actively managed. Over the past year, CANE returned -14.28% vs 7.39% for TAFM. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for TAFM.
Performance
CANE vs. TAFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than TAFM's 1.91% return.
CANE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- -10.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- -2.23%
TAFM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANE vs. TAFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -0.77% | -14.65% | -7.79% | -1.86% |
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.91% | 4.21% | 2.54% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and TAFM is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | -0.12 |
The correlation between CANE and TAFM shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. TAFM — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
TAFM
CANE vs. TAFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANE | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.47 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 2.76 | -3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 9.84 | -11.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANE | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 2.31 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.84 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
CANE vs. TAFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than TAFM's maximum drawdown of -4.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and TAFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -4.74% | -76.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -2.69% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.21% | -0.36% | -62.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -0.95% | -55.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 0.75% | +11.60% |
Volatility
CANE vs. TAFM - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) at 1.00%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | TAFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 1.00% | +5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 2.15% | +13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 3.22% | +17.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 4.95% | +16.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 4.95% | +16.77% |
CANE vs. TAFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TAFM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANE vs. TAFM - Dividend Comparison
CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF | 3.64% | 3.51% | 3.35% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CANE and TAFM have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CANE has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to TAFM (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs TAFM's -4.74%.
On 1-year performance, TAFM leads with 7.39% vs -14.28% for CANE. On fees, TAFM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, TAFM has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TAFM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs -14.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAFM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for CANE.
TAFM has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.
CANE is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while TAFM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 0.28% for TAFM.
TAFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANE and TAFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer