TAFM vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TAFM (AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAFM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TAFM returned 6.95% vs 76.62% for FWD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAFM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

TAFM vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFM achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 42.55% return.

TAFM

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 8.76%
• YTD: 42.55%
• 6M: 40.47%
• 1Y: 76.62%
• 3Y*: 40.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAFM vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.19%	4.21%	2.54%	1.51%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	42.55%	32.00%	29.23%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TAFM and FWD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.09

Return for Risk

TAFM vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAFM

TAFM Risk / Return Rank: 68
TAFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TAFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TAFM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
TAFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
TAFM Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 88
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAFM vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAFM	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.94	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	3.47	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.47	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	5.91	-3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.22	20.13	-10.90

TAFM vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFM and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAFM vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFM drawdown since its inception was -4.74%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFM and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAFM	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-29.02%	+24.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.69%	-13.03%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	0.00%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-4.06%	+3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	3.82%	-3.06%

Volatility

TAFM vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) is 0.70%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that TAFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAFM	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	11.68%	-10.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.05%	21.26%	-19.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07%	26.29%	-23.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.91%	25.25%	-20.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	25.25%	-20.34%

TAFM vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAFM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAFM vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

TAFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF	3.63%	3.51%	3.35%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAFM and FWD in my portfolio?

TAFM and FWD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAFM or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to TAFM (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFM dropped -4.74% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, TAFM or FWD?

On 1-year performance, FWD leads with 76.62% vs 6.95% for TAFM. On fees, TAFM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, TAFM has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TAFM or FWD?

Over the 1-year period, FWD has performed better with a 76.62% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TAFM or FWD?

TAFM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TAFM or FWD?

TAFM has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between TAFM and FWD?

TAFM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FWD is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for TAFM and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.