TAFM vs. LRGC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC).

TAFM and LRGC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAFM is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. LRGC is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023.

Performance

TAFM vs. LRGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TAFM vs. LRGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF	0.10%	4.21%	2.54%	1.51%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	-5.45%	16.23%	24.92%	1.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFM achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than LRGC's -5.45% return.

TAFM

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRGC

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -4.95%
• YTD: -5.45%
• 6M: -3.88%
• 1Y: 15.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAFM vs. LRGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAFM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than LRGC's 0.48% expense ratio.

LRGC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

TAFM

AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF

Return for Risk

TAFM vs. LRGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAFM

TAFM Risk / Return Rank: 36
TAFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TAFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
TAFM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TAFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TAFM Martin Ratio Rank: 33

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 51
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAFM vs. LRGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAFM	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.85	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	1.34	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.20	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	1.36	-0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	5.56	-2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAFM vs. LRGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFM Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the LRGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFM and LRGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAFM	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.85	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.14	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between TAFM and LRGC is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TAFM vs. LRGC - Dividend Comparison

TAFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than LRGC's 0.61% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TAFM AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF	3.62%	3.51%	3.35%	0.18%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.61%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Drawdowns

TAFM vs. LRGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFM drawdown since its inception was -4.74%, smaller than the maximum LRGC drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFM and LRGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAFM	LRGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-19.38%	+14.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-11.76%	+7.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-7.41%	+5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-2.22%	+1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.48%	2.88%	-1.40%

Volatility

TAFM vs. LRGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF (TAFM) is 1.32%, while AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that TAFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAFM	LRGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	5.35%	-4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.19%	9.35%	-7.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.00%	18.06%	-12.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.08%	15.42%	-10.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.08%	15.42%	-10.34%