PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMX vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAMX vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAMX vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
-1.60%9.49%12.50%9.71%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.89%27.34%3.52%7.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.89% return.


CAMX

1D
2.56%
1M
-7.47%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
0.93%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
10Y*

GCOW

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
12.89%
6M
18.87%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAMX vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAMX vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMX
CAMX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMX vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAMXGCOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

2.21

-1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

2.94

-2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.43

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.80

-2.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

14.21

-12.80

CAMX vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMX and GCOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAMXGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.21

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.60

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CAMX and GCOW is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CAMX vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than GCOW's 4.41% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
1.84%1.81%1.33%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.41%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%

Drawdowns

CAMX vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and GCOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMXGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-37.64%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-10.79%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-2.11%

-7.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-5.90%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.18%

+1.59%

Volatility

CAMX vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 3.45%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAMXGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

3.45%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

7.89%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

13.89%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

13.48%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

16.24%

-1.77%