CAMX vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CAMX is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAMX returned 13.99%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for GCOW. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

CAMX vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return.

CAMX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 8.13%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMX vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF	8.60%	9.49%	12.50%	9.71%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	27.34%	3.52%	7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMX and GCOW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2023	0.67

The correlation between CAMX and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CAMX vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAMX	GCOW
Healthcare	23.6%	14.6%
Industrials	22.9%	12.4%
Technology	13.9%	0.9%
Communication Services	11.8%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	17.1%
Energy	6.2%	24.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	4.6%
Financial Services	5.2%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	7.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

CAMX vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMX

CAMX Risk / Return Rank: 30
CAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMX vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAMX	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.52	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	3.63	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.44	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	5.71	-4.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	15.05	-10.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAMX vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMX and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAMX	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	2.52	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.59	+0.27

Drawdowns

CAMX vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAMX	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.71%	-37.64%	+21.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.79%	-4.77%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.71%	-12.35%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-2.73%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-5.84%	+3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	1.81%	+1.79%

Volatility

CAMX vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAMX	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	2.85%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	7.99%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	10.81%	+2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	13.49%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	16.20%	-1.75%

CAMX vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAMX vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF	1.67%	1.81%	1.33%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAMX and GCOW in my portfolio?

CAMX and GCOW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAMX or GCOW?

CAMX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMX dropped -15.71% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, CAMX or GCOW?

On 3-year performance, GCOW leads with 17.41% vs 13.99% for CAMX. On fees, CAMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAMX or GCOW?

Over the 3-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 13.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAMX or GCOW?

CAMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAMX or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.67% for CAMX.

What is the main difference between CAMX and GCOW?

They also come from different issuers: Cambiar Funds and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAMX and 0.60% for GCOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.