CAMX vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
CAMX and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAMX is an actively managed fund by Cambiar Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016.
Performance
CAMX vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAMX vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | -1.60% | 9.49% | 12.50% | 9.71% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.89% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.89% return.
CAMX
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 30.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAMX vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CAMX vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
CAMX
GCOW
CAMX vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAMX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 2.21 | -1.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | 2.94 | -2.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.43 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 2.80 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 14.21 | -12.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAMX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 2.21 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAMX and GCOW is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CAMX vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than GCOW's 4.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 1.84% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.41% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
CAMX vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAMX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -37.64% | +21.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -10.79% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -2.11% | -7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -5.90% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.18% | +1.59% |
Volatility
CAMX vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 3.45%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAMX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 3.45% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 7.89% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 13.89% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 13.48% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 16.24% | -1.77% |