CAMX vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CAMX is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAMX returned 13.67%/yr vs 19.10%/yr for FDL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.

Performance

CAMX vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 12.67% return.

CAMX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 13.72%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDL

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -2.75%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 6M: 13.02%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: 11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMX vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF	8.45%	9.49%	12.50%	9.65%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	12.67%	14.79%	17.98%	-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMX and FDL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.67

The correlation between CAMX and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CAMX vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAMX	FDL
Industrials	26.4%	3.9%
Healthcare	22.4%	17.6%
Communication Services	13.5%	10.6%
Technology	10.4%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	4.7%
Energy	6.2%	25.7%
Financial Services	5.3%	15.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	14.4%
Basic Materials	4.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	6.5%

Return for Risk

CAMX vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMX

CAMX Risk / Return Rank: 28
CAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 69
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMX vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAMX	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.95	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.96	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.34	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	5.26	-4.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	12.40	-8.58

CAMX vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMX and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAMX vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAMX	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.71%	-65.93%	+50.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.79%	-4.27%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.71%	-12.24%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-3.09%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-9.64%	+6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	1.81%	+1.79%

Volatility

CAMX vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 3.72%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAMX	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	3.72%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	8.09%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	11.54%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	14.31%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	17.11%	-2.61%

CAMX vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAMX vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than FDL's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF	1.67%	1.81%	1.33%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.70%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAMX and FDL in my portfolio?

CAMX and FDL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAMX or FDL?

CAMX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to FDL (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMX dropped -15.71% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, CAMX or FDL?

On 3-year performance, FDL leads with 19.10% vs 13.67% for CAMX. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAMX or FDL?

Over the 3-year period, FDL has performed better with a 19.10% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAMX or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAMX or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 1.67% for CAMX.

What is the main difference between CAMX and FDL?

They also come from different issuers: Cambiar Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAMX and 0.43% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.