CAMX vs. DIVZ
CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAMX returned 13.67%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for DIVZ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.
Performance
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 4.86% return.
CAMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 13.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVZ
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 8.45% | 9.49% | 12.50% | 9.65% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 4.86% | 16.72% | 18.44% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAMX and DIVZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CAMX and DIVZ has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAMX
DIVZ
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
CAMX
DIVZ
Healthcare
CAMX
DIVZ
Communication Services
CAMX
DIVZ
Technology
CAMX
DIVZ
Consumer Cyclical
CAMX
DIVZ
Energy
CAMX
DIVZ
Financial Services
CAMX
DIVZ
Consumer Defensive
CAMX
DIVZ
Basic Materials
CAMX
DIVZ
Real Estate
CAMX
-
DIVZ
-
Utilities
CAMX
-
DIVZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAMX vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank
CAMX
DIVZ
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAMX | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.10 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 4.98 | -1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, roughly equal to the maximum DIVZ drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and DIVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAMX | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -15.42% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -5.83% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.71% | -9.52% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -2.87% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -3.48% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.45% | +1.15% |
Volatility
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) at 3.51%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAMX | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 3.51% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 7.24% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 9.48% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 12.63% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 12.56% | +1.94% |
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAMX vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison
CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than DIVZ's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.55% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAMX and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to DIVZ (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMX dropped -15.71% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.
On 3-year performance, DIVZ leads with 15.51% vs 13.67% for CAMX. On fees, CAMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DIVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIVZ has performed better with a 15.51% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.67% for CAMX.
They also come from different issuers: Cambiar Funds and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAMX and 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAMX and DIVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer