CAMT vs. CW
CAMT (Camtek Ltd) and CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) are both stocks. CAMT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CAMT returned 52.05%/yr vs 24.16%/yr for CW. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAMT vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 46.83% return, which is significantly higher than CW's 31.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed CW with an annualized return of 52.05%, while CW has yielded a comparatively lower 24.16% annualized return.
CAMT
- 1D
- 6.16%
- 1M
- -19.99%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 46.83%
- 1Y
- 65.61%
- 3Y*
- 53.24%
- 5Y*
- 35.51%
- 10Y*
- 52.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
CW
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- YTD
- 31.08%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 56.03%
- 5Y*
- 44.53%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.27%
CAMT vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 46.83% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 31.08% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAMT and CW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, CAMT and CW have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CAMT:
$7.29B
CW:
$26.67B
CAMT:
$0.98
CW:
$13.69
CAMT:
159.43
CW:
52.76
CAMT:
32.49
CW:
2.88
CAMT:
15.35
CW:
7.48
CAMT:
11.78
CW:
10.17
CAMT:
$499.09M
CW:
$3.61B
CAMT:
$250.68M
CW:
$1.34B
CAMT:
$122.77M
CW:
$745.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAMT vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank
CAMT
CW
CAMT vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAMT | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.93 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 10.79 | -5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAMT vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and CW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAMT | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.71% | -59.19% | -38.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.77% | -12.97% | -22.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -27.21% | -35.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.16% | -27.21% | -35.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.16% | -48.73% | -14.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.73% | -8.92% | -15.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.58% | -13.87% | -41.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.61% | 4.71% | +8.90% |
Volatility
CAMT vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 25.38% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 9.62%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAMT | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.38% | 9.62% | +15.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.27% | 25.81% | +28.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.82% | 33.79% | +34.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.93% | 27.93% | +29.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.58% | 30.37% | +22.21% |
Dividends
CAMT vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
Financials
CAMT vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camtek Ltd and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAMT vs. CW - Profitability Comparison
CAMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
CAMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
CAMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAMT and CW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMT has higher volatility (25.38%) compared to CW (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMT dropped -97.71% vs CW's -59.19%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAMT and CW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer