PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAML vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAML vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 49.84% return.


CAML

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
3.12%
6M
1.68%
1Y
10.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-4.72%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
49.84%
6M
38.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAML vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
3.12%-1.67%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
49.84%-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CAML and MEME is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.56

CAML vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAML
MEME

Technology

44.7%
66.7%

Industrials

11.8%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Communication Services

9.6%
5.5%

Financial Services

8.7%
5.5%

Healthcare

6.2%
5.4%

Utilities

3.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Energy

2.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.6%

Technology

CAML
44.7%
MEME
66.7%

Industrials

CAML
11.8%
MEME
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CAML
10.0%
MEME

-

Communication Services

CAML
9.6%
MEME
5.5%

Financial Services

CAML
8.7%
MEME
5.5%

Healthcare

CAML
6.2%
MEME
5.4%

Utilities

CAML
3.4%
MEME
4.9%

Real Estate

CAML
2.4%
MEME

-

Consumer Defensive

CAML
2.4%
MEME

-

Energy

CAML
2.2%
MEME
4.8%

Basic Materials

CAML
2.0%
MEME
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAML vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAML
CAML Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CAML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAML Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAML Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CAML Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAML Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAML vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAMLMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

CAML vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAML vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMLMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-48.78%

+27.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-21.27%

+17.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-28.59%

+25.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

Volatility

CAML vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMLMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

75.53%

-60.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

75.53%

-57.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

75.53%

-57.66%

CAML vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAML vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAML nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.06%0.15%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAML and MEME have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CAML is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAML is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

CAML and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Congress and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAML and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAML and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer