CAML vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
CAML and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAML is an actively managed fund by Congress. It was launched on Aug 21, 2023. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAML or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between CAML and SCHG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CAML vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CAML:
1.54
SCHG:
1.73
CAML:
2.14
SCHG:
2.30
CAML:
1.28
SCHG:
1.31
CAML:
2.47
SCHG:
2.52
CAML:
9.20
SCHG:
9.50
CAML:
2.61%
SCHG:
3.27%
CAML:
15.56%
SCHG:
17.95%
CAML:
-9.71%
SCHG:
-34.59%
CAML:
-0.28%
SCHG:
-0.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.84% return.
CAML
6.01%
3.96%
11.87%
22.23%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
3.84%
2.70%
14.84%
29.28%
18.57%
16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAML vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAML vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CAML
SCHG
CAML vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAML vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
CAML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAML Congress Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
CAML vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -9.71%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAML vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) is 4.21%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that CAML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.