CAML vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CAML (Congress Large Cap Growth ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CAML is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, CAML returned 15.43% vs 20.89% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAML charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

CAML vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.76% return.

CAML

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 5.06%
• 6M: 4.24%
• 1Y: 15.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 13.68%
• 10Y*: 18.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAML vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAML Congress Large Cap Growth ETF	5.06%	12.43%	23.24%	10.11%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	2.76%	17.50%	34.95%	12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CAML and SCHG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	0.92

The correlation between CAML and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAML vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAML	SCHG
Technology	44.7%	46.7%
Industrials	11.8%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	12.4%
Communication Services	9.6%	15.3%
Financial Services	8.7%	6.6%
Healthcare	6.2%	8.4%
Utilities	3.4%	0.4%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	1.6%
Energy	2.2%	0.7%
Basic Materials	2.0%	1.3%

Return for Risk

CAML vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAML

CAML Risk / Return Rank: 27
CAML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CAML Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CAML Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CAML Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CAML Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 33
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAML vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAML	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.30	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.79	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.23	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	1.28	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	4.19	-0.78

CAML vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAML Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAML and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAML vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAML	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-34.59%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.86%	-16.41%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-5.16%	+3.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-5.20%	+2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	5.00%	-0.46%

Volatility

CAML vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.61% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAML	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	5.78%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	12.50%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	16.21%	-0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	22.37%	-4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.85%	21.61%	-3.76%

CAML vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAML vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

CAML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAML Congress Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAML and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CAML and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CAML or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to CAML (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAML dropped -21.06% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, CAML or SCHG?

On 1-year performance, SCHG leads with 20.89% vs 15.43% for CAML. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CAML has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAML or SCHG?

Over the 1-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 15.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAML or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAML or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for CAML.

What is the main difference between CAML and SCHG?

They also come from different issuers: Congress and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAML and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.