CAML vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, CAML achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.41% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CAML has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CAML Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAML and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CAML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than VOO's 1.34% yield.

The maximum CAML drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 6.83%. This indicates that CAML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.