CAH vs. RR.L
CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) and RR.L (Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC) are both stocks. CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while RR.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CAH returned 14.31%/yr vs 20.35%/yr for RR.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAH vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CAH is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly lower than RR.L's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CAH has underperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 14.31%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.35% annualized return.
CAH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 20.12%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 41.03%
- 3Y*
- 38.77%
- 5Y*
- 33.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
RR.L
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 110.91%
- 5Y*
- 62.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.35%
CAH vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 9.47% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 13.72% | 120.24% | 86.56% | 238.53% | -32.26% | 9.45% | -51.10% | -13.17% | -6.26% | 39.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAH and RR.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CAH and RR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAH:
$52.83B
RR.L:
£109.90B
CAH:
$6.55
RR.L:
£0.99
CAH:
34.17
RR.L:
13.19
CAH:
0.81
RR.L:
0.03
CAH:
0.21
RR.L:
2.75
CAH:
$250.55B
RR.L:
£40.12B
CAH:
$9.23B
RR.L:
£10.12B
CAH:
$2.79B
RR.L:
£9.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAH vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank
CAH
RR.L
CAH vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAH | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.31 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 6.56 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAH vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -92.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and RR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAH | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.93% | -92.32% | +30.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.42% | -19.98% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.42% | -23.51% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.80% | -64.03% | +41.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.13% | -89.47% | +43.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -3.49% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -36.66% | +20.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 7.04% | +0.71% |
Volatility
CAH vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) is 7.19%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a volatility of 12.44%. This indicates that CAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAH | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 12.44% | -5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.32% | 32.55% | -12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.30% | 37.87% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 43.93% | -18.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 50.21% | -20.95% |
Dividends
CAH vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison
CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than RR.L's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.73% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 0.54% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Financials
CAH vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAH vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAH and RR.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CAH and RR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer