CAG vs. PRU
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) and PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. CAG operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while PRU operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.70%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for PRU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAG vs. PRU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than PRU's -1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed PRU with an annualized return of -5.70%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.
CAG
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- -19.07%
- 1Y
- -30.79%
- 3Y*
- -21.83%
- 5Y*
- -13.84%
- 10Y*
- -5.70%
PRU
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -4.69%
- 1Y
- 11.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
CAG vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -17.02% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | -1.25% | 0.18% | 19.46% | 10.09% | -3.86% | 45.32% | -11.40% | 20.10% | -26.46% | 13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and PRU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2001 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
CAG:
$6.58B
PRU:
$37.91B
CAG:
-$0.09
PRU:
$9.85
CAG:
0.59
PRU:
0.80
CAG:
$11.18B
PRU:
$47.43B
CAG:
$2.70B
PRU:
$14.72B
CAG:
$792.70M
PRU:
$4.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
PRU
CAG vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.09 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 0.42 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 0.92 | -2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and PRU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -88.53% | +26.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.75% | -21.46% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.66% | -25.66% | -31.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | -33.11% | -29.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | -65.89% | +3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.06% | -9.47% | -49.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -18.31% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.37% | 9.90% | +10.47% |
Volatility
CAG vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 6.05%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 6.05% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 17.48% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.21% | 22.66% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 25.83% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 31.83% | -5.63% |
Dividends
CAG vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.19%, more than PRU's 5.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 10.19% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5.07% | 4.78% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% |
Financials
CAG vs. PRU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and PRU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to PRU (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs PRU's -88.53%.
PRU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and PRU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer