CAFG vs. PTNQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAFG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAFG returned 15.59%/yr vs 15.29%/yr for PTNQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.

Performance

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 13.51% return.

CAFG

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 25.89%
• 1Y: 32.91%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTNQ

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 8.66%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 31.85%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 16.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	27.15%	0.17%	6.95%	20.44%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	13.51%	7.18%	15.47%	21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CAFG and PTNQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.60

The correlation between CAFG and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CAFG	PTNQ
Technology	30.8%	53.2%
Industrials	19.3%	4.3%
Healthcare	18.8%	5.3%
Energy	13.4%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	12.9%
Communication Services	3.7%	16.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.8%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.1%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

CAFG vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 64
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAFG	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.06	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.72	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	2.72	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.23	9.24	+3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFG and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAFG	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.06	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.81	+0.09

Drawdowns

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and PTNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAFG	PTNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-28.07%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-11.76%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-14.19%	-9.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.72%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-5.69%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	3.46%	-0.97%

Volatility

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAFG	PTNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	4.64%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	11.47%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.40%	15.56%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	12.89%	+6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	16.37%	+3.20%

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAFG vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than PTNQ's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.34%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.78%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAFG and PTNQ in my portfolio?

CAFG and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAFG or PTNQ?

PTNQ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to CAFG (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFG dropped -23.66% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

Which ETF is better, CAFG or PTNQ?

On 3-year performance, CAFG leads with 15.59% vs 15.29% for PTNQ. On fees, CAFG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAFG or PTNQ?

Over the 3-year period, CAFG has performed better with a 15.59% return vs 15.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAFG or PTNQ?

CAFG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAFG or PTNQ?

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.34% for CAFG.

What is the main difference between CAFG and PTNQ?

CAFG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. CAFG tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAFG and 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.