PTNQ vs. PTMC
PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) and PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while PTMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTNQ returned 16.79%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for PTMC. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTNQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTMC.
Performance
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTNQ achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly lower than PTMC's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PTNQ has outperformed PTMC with an annualized return of 16.79%, while PTMC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.66% annualized return.
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 32.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 16.79%
PTMC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.66%
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 13.27% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 24.00% | 8.51% | 32.70% |
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 15.78% | -1.55% | 13.22% | 7.29% | -13.99% | 12.42% | 6.58% | 1.04% | 0.02% | 17.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTNQ and PTMC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.54 |
The correlation between PTNQ and PTMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTNQ vs. PTMC — Risk / Return Rank
PTNQ
PTMC
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTNQ | PTMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.33 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 8.51 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTNQ drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than PTMC's maximum drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTNQ and PTMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTNQ | PTMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -20.53% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -8.89% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -15.31% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -16.93% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | -20.53% | -7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.07% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -6.45% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.43% | +1.11% |
Volatility
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) at 4.38%. This indicates that PTNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTNQ | PTMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 4.38% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 11.74% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 15.69% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 13.24% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 13.02% | +3.51% |
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTNQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PTMC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTNQ vs. PTMC - Dividend Comparison
PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than PTMC's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 0.87% | 1.92% | 0.82% | 0.12% | 0.53% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTNQ and PTMC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to PTMC (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTNQ dropped -28.07% vs PTMC's -20.53%.
On 10-year performance, PTNQ leads with 16.79% vs 6.66% for PTMC. On fees, PTMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 16.79% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.78% for PTNQ.
PTNQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PTMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index, while PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTNQ and 0.60% for PTMC.
PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTNQ and PTMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer