CAFG vs. FLRT
CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAFG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. CAFG is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAFG returned 13.68%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for FLRT. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CAFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
CAFG vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 32.10% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.39% return.
CAFG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 24.42%
- YTD
- 32.10%
- 1Y
- 40.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.10%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $199.75K | $415.31K | $236.72K | |
| $4.88M | $4.59M | $4.78M |
CAFG vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 32.10% | 0.17% | 6.95% | 21.26% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.39% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAFG and FLRT is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAFG vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
CAFG
FLRT
CAFG vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAFG | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.76 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 2.89 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.92 | 10.59 | +5.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAFG vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAFG | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -20.96% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -1.78% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -2.87% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -1.39% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 0.48% | +1.99% |
Volatility
CAFG vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) at 0.29%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAFG | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 0.29% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 1.19% | +11.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 1.49% | +15.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 2.30% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 6.09% | +13.23% |
CAFG vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAFG vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than FLRT's 6.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.72% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAFG and FLRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAFG has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FLRT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFG dropped -23.66% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 3-year performance, CAFG leads with 13.68% vs 7.87% for FLRT. On fees, CAFG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CAFG has performed better with a 13.68% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAFG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 0.30% for CAFG.
CAFG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FLRT is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAFG and 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAFG and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer