PortfoliosLab logo
FLRT vs. FLTB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLRT and FLTB is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLRT vs. FLTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLRT:

2.27

FLTB:

2.84

Sortino Ratio

FLRT:

2.91

FLTB:

4.63

Omega Ratio

FLRT:

1.83

FLTB:

1.58

Calmar Ratio

FLRT:

2.30

FLTB:

5.04

Martin Ratio

FLRT:

12.43

FLTB:

15.80

Ulcer Index

FLRT:

0.53%

FLTB:

0.44%

Daily Std Dev

FLRT:

2.89%

FLTB:

2.34%

Max Drawdown

FLRT:

-20.96%

FLTB:

-9.37%

Current Drawdown

FLRT:

0.00%

FLTB:

-0.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRT achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than FLTB's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRT has outperformed FLTB with an annualized return of 5.53%, while FLTB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.


FLRT

YTD

1.59%

1M

2.38%

6M

2.58%

1Y

6.51%

5Y*

6.98%

10Y*

5.53%

FLTB

YTD

2.47%

1M

0.91%

6M

2.96%

1Y

6.58%

5Y*

1.93%

10Y*

2.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLRT vs. FLTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTB's 0.36% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLRT vs. FLTB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLRT is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLRT is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLTB is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLTB is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLRT vs. FLTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FLTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRT and FLTB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLRT vs. FLTB - Dividend Comparison

FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than FLTB's 4.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
7.48%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.95%3.20%3.38%3.21%0.00%
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.23%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%0.35%

Drawdowns

FLRT vs. FLTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRT drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, which is greater than FLTB's maximum drawdown of -9.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRT and FLTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLRT vs. FLTB - Volatility Comparison

Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) have volatilities of 0.66% and 0.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...