CABZ vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CABZ (Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CABZ is actively managed, while GINN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CABZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

CABZ vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CABZ

• 1D: -6.81%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -3.49%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 4.53%
• 1Y: 22.24%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 6.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABZ vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	-4.23%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CABZ and GINN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.83

CABZ vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CABZ	GINN
Technology	52.2%	32.4%
Consumer Cyclical	35.8%	14.6%
Communication Services	12.0%	10.8%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.0%
Energy	-	1.4%
Financial Services	-	11.4%
Healthcare	-	18.6%
Industrials	-	6.1%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

CABZ vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 39
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABZ vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CABZ	GINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.42	-0.74

Drawdowns

CABZ vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABZ drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABZ and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABZ	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-41.25%	+18.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.64%	-4.21%	-5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-13.35%	+4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CABZ	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.64%	16.45%	+17.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.64%	21.37%	+12.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.64%	21.09%	+12.55%

CABZ vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABZ vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

CABZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CABZ Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.19%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABZ and GINN in my portfolio?

CABZ and GINN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CABZ or GINN?

On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CABZ or GINN?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CABZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CABZ or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for CABZ.

What is the main difference between CABZ and GINN?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CABZ and 0.50% for GINN.