C001.DE vs. AMED.DE
C001.DE (Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - C001.DE tracks the DAX® while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE returned 8.91%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C001.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 8.91%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
C001.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 1.38% | 22.63% | 18.38% | 19.46% | -12.82% | 15.35% | 3.10% | 24.61% | -18.48% | 12.20% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between C001.DE and AMED.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between C001.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C001.DE
AMED.DE
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C001.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.33 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.49 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 9.40 | -8.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C001.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.74 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C001.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.60% | -38.35% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -10.56% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -14.07% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -24.06% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -38.35% | -0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -0.17% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -6.69% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.81% | +1.16% |
Volatility
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) is 5.16%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that C001.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C001.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 5.61% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 12.64% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 15.19% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 15.87% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 17.00% | +1.24% |
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C001.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist | 1.99% | 2.02% | 2.17% | 3.04% | 2.72% | 1.91% | 2.36% | 2.52% | 3.10% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C001.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C001.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C001.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
C001.DE tracks DAX®, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for C001.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for C001.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer