PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE).

C001.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023.

Performance

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist		-5.71%22.63%18.38%19.46%-12.82%15.35%3.10%24.61%-18.48%12.20%
HP3A.DE
Ringmetall SE		-1.45%-18.40%17.31%-24.00%-3.06%79.66%-4.03%-6.38%-27.19%31.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than HP3A.DE's -1.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with C001.DE having a 8.41% annualized return and HP3A.DE not far ahead at 8.65%.

C001.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
8.41%

HP3A.DE

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
-19.81%
3Y*
-5.45%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
8.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist

Ringmetall SE

Often compared with C001.DE:
C001.DE vs. XD5E.DEC001.DE vs. UB06.LC001.DE vs. IAUC001.DE vs. AAPLC001.DE vs. EXXT.DEC001.DE vs. ^NDXC001.DE vs. VGER.DE
Often compared with HP3A.DE:
HP3A.DE vs. DAXX.LHP3A.DE vs. ^GDAXIHP3A.DE vs. ^GSPCHP3A.DE vs. DAX

Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
C001.DE
C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
HP3A.DE
HP3A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HP3A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HP3A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HP3A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HP3A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HP3A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

C001.DEHP3A.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

-0.60

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

-0.77

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.90

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

-0.98

+1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.72

-1.61

+3.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C001.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the HP3A.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C001.DE and HP3A.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

C001.DEHP3A.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

-0.60

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.08

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.25

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.22

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and HP3A.DE is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than HP3A.DE's 3.68% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist		2.14%2.02%2.17%3.04%2.72%1.91%2.36%2.52%3.10%2.72%0.00%0.00%
HP3A.DE
Ringmetall SE		3.68%3.62%2.87%3.27%2.17%1.38%2.43%2.27%2.08%1.24%1.62%3.07%

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, smaller than the maximum HP3A.DE drawdown of -65.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and HP3A.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

C001.DEHP3A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.60%

-65.99%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-22.03%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-47.52%

+20.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

-55.05%

+16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-42.61%

+33.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-21.51%

+13.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

13.38%

-9.85%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. HP3A.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) is 6.66%, while Ringmetall SE (HP3A.DE) has a volatility of 11.16%. This indicates that C001.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HP3A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

C001.DEHP3A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

11.16%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

24.79%

-13.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

33.34%

-15.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

38.93%

-22.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

37.15%

-18.96%