AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - AMED.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 21.42%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.42% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 19.52%
- 1Y
- 37.91%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 20.65% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 42.90% | 3.22% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.58 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and 6AQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
6AQQ.DE
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.77 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 11.17 | -1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.41 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.94 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.08 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.08 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -31.19% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.01% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -26.73% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -31.19% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -31.19% | -7.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.84% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -5.36% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.39% | -0.58% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.40%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.40% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 10.96% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 15.66% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 19.83% | -3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 19.63% | -2.63% |
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
AMED.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer