C001.DE vs. UB06.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L).

C001.DE and UB06.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C001.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. UB06.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 19, 2002. Both C001.DE and UB06.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist	-5.71%	22.63%	18.38%	19.46%	-12.82%	15.35%	3.10%	24.61%	-18.48%	12.20%
UB06.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	0.24%	23.82%	9.87%	18.90%	-11.33%	21.60%	-0.67%	26.54%	-12.42%	12.65%

Different Trading Currencies

C001.DE is traded in EUR, while UB06.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB06.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than UB06.L's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE has underperformed UB06.L with an annualized return of 8.41%, while UB06.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.49% annualized return.

C001.DE

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -2.89%
• YTD: -5.71%
• 6M: -5.36%
• 1Y: 2.89%
• 3Y*: 13.51%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

UB06.L

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -3.97%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 14.53%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 9.93%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than UB06.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

UB06.L

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

C001.DE

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. UB06.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C001.DE

C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

UB06.L

UB06.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
UB06.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UB06.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
UB06.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
UB06.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UB06.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	C001.DE	UB06.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	0.91	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	1.26	-0.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.18	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	1.42	-0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.72	5.09	-3.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C001.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the UB06.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C001.DE and UB06.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	C001.DE	UB06.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	0.91	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.62	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.55	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.59	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and UB06.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than UB06.L's 2.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
C001.DE Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist	2.14%	2.02%	2.17%	3.04%	2.72%	1.91%	2.36%	2.52%	3.10%	2.72%	0.00%	0.00%
UB06.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	2.67%	2.49%	2.80%	2.68%	2.68%	1.88%	1.57%	2.84%	3.20%	2.52%	2.50%	2.92%

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, which is greater than UB06.L's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and UB06.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	C001.DE	UB06.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.60%	-31.36%	-10.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-10.91%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.64%	-21.60%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.62%	-31.36%	-7.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.05%	-6.78%	-2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.29%	-5.04%	-3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	2.94%	+0.59%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. UB06.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) have volatilities of 6.66% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C001.DE	UB06.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	6.69%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	10.39%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.43%	16.04%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	16.13%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.19%	17.24%	+0.95%