PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE).

C001.DE and XD5E.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C001.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. XD5E.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012. Both C001.DE and XD5E.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist		-5.71%22.63%18.38%19.46%-12.82%15.35%3.10%24.61%-18.48%12.20%
XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D		-0.02%24.71%9.50%18.86%-11.92%22.17%-0.74%27.44%-12.93%13.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than XD5E.DE's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE has underperformed XD5E.DE with an annualized return of 8.41%, while XD5E.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.

C001.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
8.41%

XD5E.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
3.20%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist

Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with C001.DE:
C001.DE vs. HP3A.DEC001.DE vs. UB06.LC001.DE vs. IAUC001.DE vs. AAPLC001.DE vs. EXXT.DEC001.DE vs. ^NDXC001.DE vs. VGER.DE
Often compared with XD5E.DE:
XD5E.DE vs. EXV3.DEXD5E.DE vs. H4ZJ.DEXD5E.DE vs. EXXT.DEXD5E.DE vs. VGWL.DEXD5E.DE vs. VDIV.DEXD5E.DE vs. CEMT.DEXD5E.DE vs. AMES.DE

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XD5E.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
C001.DE
C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE
XD5E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XD5E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD5E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

C001.DEXD5E.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

0.90

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

1.28

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.18

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.73

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.72

6.64

-4.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C001.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the XD5E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C001.DE and XD5E.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

C001.DEXD5E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.90

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.55

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.52

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and XD5E.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than XD5E.DE's 2.63% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist		2.14%2.02%2.17%3.04%2.72%1.91%2.36%2.52%3.10%2.72%0.00%0.00%
XD5E.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D		2.63%2.54%2.86%2.74%4.66%1.41%2.94%2.59%1.89%2.51%0.73%0.36%

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, which is greater than XD5E.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and XD5E.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

C001.DEXD5E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.60%

-38.04%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-10.26%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-24.56%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

-38.04%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-6.53%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-5.79%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.68%

+0.85%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. XD5E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EMU UCITS ETF 1D (XD5E.DE) at 6.14%. This indicates that C001.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XD5E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

C001.DEXD5E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

6.14%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

10.19%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

15.98%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

15.90%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

16.98%

+1.21%