PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE).

C001.DE and EXXT.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C001.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 7, 2023. EXXT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Mar 27, 2006. Both C001.DE and EXXT.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist		-5.71%22.63%18.38%19.46%-12.82%15.35%3.10%24.61%-18.48%12.20%
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)		-4.17%6.87%33.51%51.27%-30.11%39.07%34.53%42.79%2.90%15.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C001.DE achieves a -5.71% return, which is significantly lower than EXXT.DE's -4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, C001.DE has underperformed EXXT.DE with an annualized return of 8.41%, while EXXT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.

C001.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
8.41%

EXXT.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
-1.94%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist

iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)

Often compared with C001.DE:
C001.DE vs. HP3A.DEC001.DE vs. XD5E.DEC001.DE vs. UB06.LC001.DE vs. IAUC001.DE vs. AAPLC001.DE vs. ^NDXC001.DE vs. VGER.DE
Often compared with EXXT.DE:
EXXT.DE vs. CNDX.ASEXXT.DE vs. EQQQ.LEXXT.DE vs. SXR8.DEEXXT.DE vs. SXRV.DEEXXT.DE vs. IS3R.DEEXXT.DE vs. QQQEXXT.DE vs. SPY

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C001.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EXXT.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.

EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
C001.DE
C001.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
C001.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C001.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
C001.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
C001.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
C001.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE
EXXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) and iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

C001.DEEXXT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

0.76

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

1.16

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.16

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.28

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.72

6.83

-5.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C001.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C001.DE and EXXT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

C001.DEEXXT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.76

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.66

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.93

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.73

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between C001.DE and EXXT.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Dividend Comparison

C001.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than EXXT.DE's 0.19% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C001.DE
Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist		2.14%2.02%2.17%3.04%2.72%1.91%2.36%2.52%3.10%2.72%0.00%0.00%
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)		0.19%0.19%0.26%0.53%0.41%0.15%0.32%0.40%0.28%1.84%0.84%0.88%

Drawdowns

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C001.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.60%, smaller than the maximum EXXT.DE drawdown of -46.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C001.DE and EXXT.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

C001.DEEXXT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.60%

-46.75%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-10.08%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-31.39%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

-31.39%

-7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-7.55%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-7.80%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.37%

+0.16%

Volatility

C001.DE vs. EXXT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi DAX UCITS ETF Dist (C001.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) at 4.72%. This indicates that C001.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

C001.DEEXXT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

4.72%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

11.94%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

20.74%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

19.91%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

19.72%

-1.53%