AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMED.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.71%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 9.71%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 26.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.28% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.52 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
LSMC.DE
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.59 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 10.37 | -7.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 32.83 | -23.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 4.27 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 1.15 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.09 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.82 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, roughly equal to the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -39.77% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -12.53% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -36.22% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -39.77% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -39.77% | +1.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -3.34% | +2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -9.37% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.96% | -1.15% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) is 5.90%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that AMED.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 11.23% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 22.18% | -9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 30.40% | -15.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 31.21% | -15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 26.06% | -9.06% |
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
AMED.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer