BYDDF vs. QQQI
BYDDF (BYD Company Limited) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, BYDDF returned -42.40% vs 23.23% for QQQI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BYDDF vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYDDF achieves a -20.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 9.46% return.
BYDDF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -16.59%
- YTD
- -20.08%
- 6M
- -18.85%
- 1Y
- -42.40%
- 3Y*
- -1.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 18.76%
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 9.46%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BYDDF vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BYDDF BYD Company Limited | -20.08% | 11.38% | 47.92% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 9.46% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYDDF and QQQI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYDDF vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
BYDDF
QQQI
BYDDF vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BYDDF | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.30 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 2.43 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | 10.31 | -12.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BYDDF vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYDDF drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDF and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYDDF | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.78% | -20.00% | -66.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.50% | -9.61% | -33.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.13% | -3.67% | -45.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.97% | -2.21% | -38.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.48% | 2.26% | +22.22% |
Volatility
BYDDF vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.62%. This indicates that BYDDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYDDF | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 7.62% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.21% | 11.94% | +15.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.80% | 14.78% | +21.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.33% | 17.51% | +27.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.10% | 17.51% | +29.59% |
Dividends
BYDDF vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than QQQI's 15.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDF BYD Company Limited | 0.54% | 6.04% | 1.28% | 0.58% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 2.03% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 15.03% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYDDF and QQQI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYDDF has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to QQQI (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDF dropped -86.78% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BYDDF and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer