BXC vs. OSUR
BXC (BlueLinx Holdings Inc.) and OSUR (OraSure Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. BXC operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while OSUR operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BXC returned 22.66%/yr vs -4.53%/yr for OSUR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BXC vs. OSUR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXC achieves a -9.62% return, which is significantly lower than OSUR's 71.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BXC has outperformed OSUR with an annualized return of 22.66%, while OSUR has yielded a comparatively lower -4.53% annualized return.
BXC
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- 13.65%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -8.79%
- 1Y
- -19.23%
- 3Y*
- -14.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 22.66%
OSUR
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 15.24%
- YTD
- 71.90%
- 6M
- 72.61%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- -6.63%
- 5Y*
- -15.45%
- 10Y*
- -4.53%
BXC vs. OSUR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXC BlueLinx Holdings Inc. | -9.62% | -39.87% | -9.84% | 59.34% | -25.74% | 227.27% | 105.33% | -42.33% | 153.18% | 30.66% |
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 71.90% | -32.96% | -55.98% | 70.12% | -44.53% | -17.90% | 31.82% | -31.25% | -38.07% | 114.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXC and OSUR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2004 | 0.20 |
The correlation between BXC and OSUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BXC:
-$0.68
OSUR:
-$0.73
BXC:
0.11
OSUR:
3.53
BXC:
$2.98B
OSUR:
$85.12M
BXC:
$447.15M
OSUR:
$33.04M
BXC:
$79.53M
OSUR:
-$47.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXC vs. OSUR — Risk / Return Rank
BXC
OSUR
BXC vs. OSUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) and OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXC | OSUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.99 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 2.22 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXC vs. OSUR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXC drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than OSUR's maximum drawdown of -90.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXC and OSUR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXC | OSUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -90.75% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.62% | -39.37% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.56% | -74.73% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.56% | -84.23% | +18.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.71% | -90.75% | -0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.89% | -81.76% | +23.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.96% | -56.72% | -9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.62% | 17.46% | +9.16% |
Volatility
BXC vs. OSUR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BXC) is 13.73%, while OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) has a volatility of 20.12%. This indicates that BXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OSUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXC | OSUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.73% | 20.12% | -6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.30% | 34.50% | +12.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.36% | 48.62% | +10.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.22% | 54.97% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.27% | 56.94% | +13.33% |
Dividends
BXC vs. OSUR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BXC nor OSUR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BXC vs. OSUR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlueLinx Holdings Inc. and OraSure Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BXC vs. OSUR - Profitability Comparison
BXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 116.40M and revenue of 731.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.
OSUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.80K and revenue of 27.93K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.
BXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
OSUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -23.18K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in an operating margin of -83.0%.
BXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. reported a net income of -1.46M and revenue of 731.15M, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.
OSUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -22.38K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in a net margin of -80.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BXC and OSUR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSUR has higher volatility (20.12%) compared to BXC (13.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXC dropped -97.46% vs OSUR's -90.75%.
OSUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXC and OSUR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer